<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Dynamic Range</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steve-payne.com/blog/2008/05/23/foto-friday-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steve-payne.com/blog/2008/05/23/foto-friday-5/</link>
	<description>A Photoshop Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:00:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nailietty</title>
		<link>http://steve-payne.com/blog/2008/05/23/foto-friday-5/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>nailietty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve-payne.com/blog/?p=40#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Hi. Your site displays incorrectly in Firefox, but content excellent! Thank you for your wise words:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Your site displays incorrectly in Firefox, but content excellent! Thank you for your wise words:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Weir</title>
		<link>http://steve-payne.com/blog/2008/05/23/foto-friday-5/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steve-payne.com/blog/?p=40#comment-317</guid>
		<description>At first I saw it as a really nice photo, then on closer inspection it looks more light something setup in a studio. Is this the fall back from HD photography? Is it just too HD to really take absorb the photo as a whole? I still love the shot anyways and think its been done really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I saw it as a really nice photo, then on closer inspection it looks more light something setup in a studio. Is this the fall back from HD photography? Is it just too HD to really take absorb the photo as a whole? I still love the shot anyways and think its been done really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
